- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:19:28 -0400
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <54243280.7060202@openlinksw.com>
On 9/25/14 9:25 AM, Peter Mika wrote: > Hi Renato, > > The W3C in particular did not want to take on vertical vocabulary projects > in the past. Tim B-L emphasized in multiple talks that the W3C would like > to focus on developing ontology languages, and let industry develop > vertical solutions. (To me the examples you mentioned such as SKOS and > PROV are part of the language infrastructure.) > > schema.org is such a vertical solution based on the needs of large web > consumers. > > Best, > Peter Maybe "domain specific" is a better characterization for schema.org. The domain in question is Web Publishing. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:19:50 UTC