Re: September Update on Sports

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> > If you really want to go down this route, though, I would suggest
> roleName
> > directly on Role that could serve for any future subtypes as well.
> > Otherwise, properties like characterName and namedPosition are just
> going to
> > propagate as more Role subtypes emerge for different contexts.
>
> roleName on Role (expecting Text or URL) works for me,



Promoting "namedPosition" to Role and renaming the property "roleName" or
the like soungs good to me.

- Vicki


Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com

Received on Thursday, 25 September 2014 13:24:52 UTC