- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:59:58 -0700
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
- CC: "Jason Johnson (BING)" <jasjoh@microsoft.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Intriguing. Is there going to be a non-trivial theory of sports. For example, will there be sub-sports? peter On 09/24/2014 11:19 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: > > On 24 Sep 2014 18:48, "Vicki Tardif Holland" <vtardif@google.com > <mailto:vtardif@google.com>> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net > <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>> wrote: > >> > >> A "namedPosition" property would be fine, as long as the range is not > schema:Text. IMO, something like this should use URIs for such enumerated > values. Schema.org always allows falling back to text. > > > > > > I am looking at http://sdo-sports.appspot.com/OrganizationRole. The range > is URL or text. I agree that URIs should be used to have any hope of > understanding what the value means. > > Yes, I'm also updating 'sport' property similarly. > > Dan >
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2014 19:00:31 UTC