- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:18:58 +0100
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 20 September 2014 01:28, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > On 09/19/2014 10:42 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: >> On 2 July 2014 21:12, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: >>> Hi Sam and thanks for fast reply! >>> >>> first question bit out of topic, do you have somewhere published HTML >>> copy of https://www.w3.org/wiki/images/1/10/PotentialActionsApril11.pdf ? >> >> Yes, I cleaned up an HTML version recently and posted it at >> http://schema.org/docs/actions.html >> >> Dan > Thanks Dan, > > I've noticed it and even made tiny PR recently: http://git.io/1nHpZw Thanks - I just merged it :) > I also recommend checking out Github Flavoured Markdown[1] > Yesterday I made an example of simple rewriting PDF as GFM > https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/issues/125 Interesting! Generally the use comes from people finding (Google)Docs easier to collaborate with than W3C's MediaWiki installation, what was where I originally tried to get people to work together. Git + markdown is an interesting option, I think it'll appeal to some. And then of course there's the actual RDFS itself too; for now we're using slightly awkward RDFa+RDFS-based files, but JSON-LD is another option. JSON doesn't handle comments well, unfortunately. > Cheers! > > [1] > https://guides.github.com/features/mastering-markdown/#GitHub-flavored-markdown >
Received on Saturday, 20 September 2014 07:19:26 UTC