Re: Schema.org proposal: New Actions and Actions contigent on an Offer

If you combine that with a schema:eligibleRegion statement, you would say that there is an offer, it is currently not available, but if it were available, China was the only eligible country.

Martin


On 19 Sep 2014, at 10:12, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just to be sure, what about:
> 
> "@type": "Offer",
>  "availability": "http://schema.org/False",
> 
> 2014-09-19 10:10 GMT+02:00 martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>:
> I think this will not work, because you say that the Offer entity  is also an instance of "False". What you really want to do is negate the statement, not the single entity. Such would require reiification, e.g. something like a "Negation Role" for making such negative statements.
> 
> One thing, though: In the current version of schema.org, False and True are subtypes of Boolean. They should be instances /  enumerated values.
> 
> @Dan: It would be nice to fix that.
> 
> Martin
> 
> On 19 Sep 2014, at 00:24, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Sorry for spamming - I'm toying around with it in my head- how about an MTE?
> >
> > {
> > "@context": "http://schema.org",
> > "@type": "WatchAction",
> > "target": "http://www.hulu.com/the­daily­show­with­jon­stewart",
> > "contingentOnOffer": {
> >       "@type": [ "Offer", "False" ],
> >       "availableAtOrFrom": {
> >               "@type": "Country",
> >               "name": "CHN"
> >       }
> > }
> >
> > 2014-09-19 0:18 GMT+02:00 Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>:
> > And maybe 'contingentOnOffer' can be renamed to something like 'dependsOnOffer'.
> >
> > As I'm not a native English speaker I had to look up what 'contingent on' first before I understood what it meant. So if you could 'dumb down' the term a bit I'd be much obliged.   :)
> >
> > 2014-09-19 0:10 GMT+02:00 Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>:
> > is 'notAvailableAtOrFrom' really needed, wouldn't the following work as well?
> >
> > Not Available in China
> >
> > {
> > "@context": "http://schema.org",
> > "@type": "WatchAction",
> > "target": "http://www.hulu.com/the­daily­show­with­jon­stewart",
> > "contingentOnOffer": {
> >       "@type": "Offer",
> >       "availability": "http://schema.org/False",
> >       "availableAtOrFrom": {
> >               "@type": "Country",
> >               "name": "CHN"
> >       }
> > }
> >
> > 2014-09-18 23:44 GMT+02:00 ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>:
> > On 09/18/2014 10:43 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> > > On 09/17/2014 11:21 PM, Vicki Tardif Holland wrote:
> > >> And adding to Offer
> > >> http://schema.org/notAvailableAtOrFrom
> > > Whenever we change Offer I think we should check if it also makes sense
> > > for Demand. Also looking at name of this property @|@ I would propose
> > > considering some alternative solutions before committing to this one. I
> > > have some suggestions but would prefer to share them in github PR (or Issue)
> > I just suggested another pattern in:
> > https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/issues/125#issuecomment-56107865
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>

Received on Friday, 19 September 2014 08:25:34 UTC