Re: Schema.org proposal: New Actions and Actions contigent on an Offer

And maybe 'contingentOnOffer' can be renamed to something like
'dependsOnOffer'.

As I'm not a native English speaker I had to look up what 'contingent on'
first before I understood what it meant. So if you could 'dumb down' the
term a bit I'd be much obliged.   :)

2014-09-19 0:10 GMT+02:00 Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>:

> is 'notAvailableAtOrFrom' really needed, wouldn't the following work as
> well?
>
> Not Available in China
>
> {
> "@context": "http://schema.org",
> "@type": "WatchAction",
> "target": "http://www.hulu.com/the­daily­show­with­jon­stewart",
> "contingentOnOffer": {
> "@type": "Offer",
> "availability": "http://schema.org/False",
> "availableAtOrFrom": {
> "@type": "Country",
> "name": "CHN"
> }
> }
>
> 2014-09-18 23:44 GMT+02:00 ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>:
>
>> On 09/18/2014 10:43 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
>> > On 09/17/2014 11:21 PM, Vicki Tardif Holland wrote:
>> >> And adding to Offer
>> >> http://schema.org/notAvailableAtOrFrom
>> > Whenever we change Offer I think we should check if it also makes sense
>> > for Demand. Also looking at name of this property @|@ I would propose
>> > considering some alternative solutions before committing to this one. I
>> > have some suggestions but would prefer to share them in github PR (or
>> Issue)
>> I just suggested another pattern in:
>> https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/issues/125#issuecomment-56107865
>>
>>
>>
>