Re: ItemList proposal

>
> "and then ran out of tuesday"


hehe, I can relate to that, NP.

2014-09-17 0:28 GMT+02:00 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>:

> On 16 September 2014 22:21, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I think the omission of 'itemposition' is problematic in this case as
> there
> > is no implied order. Which a breadcrumb definitely has. That's actually
> one
> > of the things I think is wrong with the datavocabulary breadcrumb (as
> well
> > as it generating multiple top level entities without any property to link
> > them to the WebPage).
> >
> > Without 'itemposition' we'd have to revert to nesting elements to be
> able to
> > preserve the order.
>
> Yes, I meant to add those in after I got it working in RDFa, started
> chatting w/ Stephane Corlosquet to that end, ... and then ran out of
> tuesday. But yes, position is needed explicitly...
>
> Dan
>