Re: ItemList proposal from martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org on 2014-09-12 (public-vocabs@w3.org from September 2014)

From: <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:56:36 +0200
To: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: "Jason Johnson (BING)" <jasjoh@microsoft.com>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3AF90C36-2987-4744-BFCA-0D61241F8CDA@ebusiness-unibw.org>

Hi 12 Sep 2014, at 14:26, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> I also took a look at the latest proposal at [1].
> 
> A couple of small suggestions:
> 
> -- We should turn itemListOrder into an Enum of fixed values (ascending, descending, unordered).
If you want to go down that route: What about using the union of 

- a subtype of schema:QualitativeValue - schema:OrderedBy with two values as predefined individuals, schema:Ascending, schema:Descending and

and

- schema:Text

?

So people can use schema:Ascending or schema:Descending while still being able to use free text for other cases?

For "unordered", I would simply omit the itemListOrder property.

Martin

Received on Friday, 12 September 2014 12:57:08 UTC