Re: ItemList proposal

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> Yeah, we do try to avoid ontological vanity. If it's a choice between
> us thinking "oh dear, that could've been better named" and 1000s of
> sites having already adopted something even if awkwardly designed, we
> lean towards being a bit ugly and living with the deployed reality.
> Unless there's a serious usability/intelligibility benefit, or it's
> part of a larger consistency cleanup. In this case it's not sounding
> like we've a strong enough case for renaming - so I think you're
> right. Jason/Vicki, any objections to restoring itemListElement?
>

+1 to restoring itemListElement to preserve current usage.

- Vicki


Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com