- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@unibw.de>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:20:09 +0200
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>, Yuliya Tikhokhod <tilid@yandex-team.ru>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>, "schema-org-team@googlegroups.com" <schema-org-team@googlegroups.com>
What about simply using ItemList for a series of entities? Martin On 16 Oct 2014, at 00:09, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes Vicki > > (only if you make it generic enough), > > The common Entertainment domains, like those you listed, probably > could all re-use a generic Series type. > > After Entertainment, the other kinds of Series, that I can think of, > happen in the Scientific, Manufacturing, and Architectural domains > primarily and may not be of a category against something that is > Creative (that usually has a Creator attached), but more dry like a > SeriesClass or SeriesGroup or ProductLine/Series (where there is > usually NOT a Creator as a person, but still might have a Creator that > is an organization, a Creator none-the-less). > > Make it generic enough and it should be able to deal with: > > A Book Series, > A Video Game Series, > A TV Series, > A Radio Series, > A Manufacturing Product Line (Also known as a Manufacturing Series): > http://www.colt.com/Catalog/Rifles/LE6920Series.aspx > etc. > > Agreed. > > -- > -Thad > +ThadGuidry > Thad on LinkedIn >
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 22:20:39 UTC