Re: VideoGame proposal

2014-10-15 21:00 GMT+02:00 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>:
>
>
> We should also add an example showing how to associate a VideoGame
> with a http://schema.org/VideoObject using 'about', and address the
> various little formatting issues Aaron just brought up as I was
> posting this. But otherwise I think we're getting there. The options
> above do leave out the possibility of putting in VideoGameSeries as a
> type with a different supertype than Series, but that seems to be
> storing up confusion for the future. Using isPartOf and hasPart covers
> a lot of ground and gets something out there - we can always add more
> terms later.
>
> cheers,
>
> Dan
>

"We should also add an example showing how to associate a VideoGame
with a http://schema.org/VideoObject using 'about'"

Might I suggest (again) we change the domain of associatedMedia to Thing?

As proposed in: https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/associatedMediaToThing
And discussed in:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014May/0204.html