- From: <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:56:08 +0200
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Hi, I think elf means to relate it to eligibleRegion. availableAtOrFrom defines the place from where you can obtain a (typically physical) product. Now, there are two ways for achieving this. We could expand the domain of eligibleRegion and update its text, or simply leave the regionsAllowed property as it is. I opt for the latter, since consolidating the two does not really buy us a lot and adds complexity, since it links the GoodRelations part of schema.org with other branches. In general, I would not recommend to reuse GoodRelations properties in schema.org for purposes outside the Agent-Promise-Object-Location core model, because it will become difficult to track conflicts and contradictions then. Martin On 12 Oct 2014, at 01:09, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > On 09/17/2014 11:21 PM, Vicki Tardif Holland wrote: >> And adding to Offer >> http://schema.org/notAvailableAtOrFrom > Hi Vicki, > > I just noticed > http://schema.org/regionsAllowed > > I think we could try to explain differences in its usage from > http://schema.org/availableAtOrFrom > > Especially in context of examples from your proposal > https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/issues/125 > > Cheers! >
Received on Monday, 13 October 2014 22:56:30 UTC