- From: <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:56:32 +0200
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
I am not sure I understand the problem here, but keep in mind that schema:Product is a *role* that a schema:Thing can have: that of being the object of a schema:Offer. schema:Product is conceptually not disjoint from any other type (socially likely from some, e.g. schema:Person, ...). So there is not necessarily a formal inconsistency here. schema:Product stresses that the entity is / could be related to a schema:Offer, but other types do not rule out that. Martin On 06 Oct 2014, at 21:48, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > Howdy, > > While tweaking some schema:Action examples I've noticed inconsistent way > of referring to what I would call a WebService. > > * http://schema.org/OrderAction gives Amazon type schema:Product > * http://schema.org/IgnoreAction gives social.com type schema:WebPage > * http://schema.org/BookmarkAction gives Instagram type schema:Product > * http://schema.org/CheckInAction gives aa.com type schema:WebApplication > * http://schema.org/FollowAction gives Twitter type schema:Product > > My first thought was to change them all to schema:WebApplication which I > added to TODO checklist in https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/pull/15 > > But in my recent work which heavily focuses on Cross Origin Resource > Sharing[1], decoupled interfaces [2] and unhosted web apps [3] I see > *fundamental difference* between an App and Service. For me an App runs > on device *locally* and can interact with *any number of remote* > Services. Also Twiter, Instagram, Amazon etc. fit for me more as sub > type of http://schema.org/Service People can already use all kind of > Apps to use those Services. > > +/-1 for Thing > Intangible > Service > WebService ? > > Which could add among other properties termsOfService - > https://tosdr.org/ (BTW also unhosted.org spin-off) > > http://schema.org/WebApplication has stuff like > downloadUrl, screenshot etc. which fits what I would consider an App :) > > Cheers! > > > [1] http://enable-cors.org/ > [2] http://decoupledcms.org/ > [3] https://unhosted.org/ >
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2014 11:56:57 UTC