- From: Edward Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 17:42:42 -0400
- To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <5778E469-7263-47A8-AB60-E1FFA3E97CA0@pobox.com>
Oops, I’m not sure what I was thinking re: 2.2.3 :-) I meant RFC 7089. //Ed On May 30, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Edward Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote: > It’s relatively complex but I wonder if you have looked at RFC 2.2.3 and its notion of a "time map" at all. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7089 > > //Ed > > On May 30, 2014, at 5:09 AM, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> wrote: > >> Hi vocabulers >> >> We have more and more records in LOV of which URIs are 404, unfortunately, with no replacing resource whatsoever. >> See e.g., http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_dir.html etc >> We want to keep the record in LOV, along with backup versions, such as >> http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/agg/archives/dir_dir/file_dir_2006-06-27.n3 >> >> We want to flag the URI some way, such as some "offlineSince" or "validUntil" property, with value a xsd:date. This property would be added to the VOAF vocabulary, unless someone knows about an existing property to express that. There are various "valid" properties in DC terms and other vocabularies, but not sure they capture the expected semantics. >> >> Thanks for any suggestion. >> >> -- >> Bernard Vatant >> Vocabularies & Data Engineering >> Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 >> Skype : bernard.vatant >> http://google.com/+BernardVatant >> -------------------------------------------------------- >> Mondeca >> 35 boulevard de Strasbourg 75010 Paris >> www.mondeca.com >> Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >
Received on Friday, 30 May 2014 21:43:14 UTC