- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 09:50:06 -0400
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5364F40E.10807@openlinksw.com>
On 5/2/14 9:20 PM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote: > But before people are again afraid of reinventing RDF inside schema.org: This is really an edge case, and in real-scale scenarios, the transformation of the raw PropertyValue data into triples or equivalent structures will involve more advanced processing - heuristics, machine learning, ... You make a bold assumption for the Web populace, as a whole. Basically, you are assuming that users, developers, designers etc.. will never understand the semantics expressed in an RDF triple. You are also assuming that all data consumers will be resigned to their own heuristics for basic structured data processing and relations semantics comprehension. As indicated by my +1 to Holger's comments, why don't you simply confine this heuristic to Microdata since this is the syntax with the limitation? Good documentation and examples will enable those that have to work with Microdata (no matter what) go with this suggestion, if it suits their needs. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Saturday, 3 May 2014 13:50:29 UTC