- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 18:10:48 -0700
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 'Pat Hayes' <phayes@ihmc.us>
- CC: public-hydra@w3.org, public-lod@w3.org, 'W3C Web Schemas Task Force' <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 03/29/2014 03:30 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 5:26 AM, Pat Hayes wrote: >> Hmm. I would be inclined to violate IRI opacity at this point and have >> a convention that says that any schema.org property schema:ppp can have >> a sister property called schema:pppList, for any character string ppp. >> So you ought to check schema:knowsList when you are asked to look for >> schema:knows. Then although there isn't a link in the conventional >> sense, there is a computable route from schema:knows to >> schema:knowsList, which as far as I am concerned amounts to a link. > Schema.org doesn't suffer from this issue as much as other vocabularies do > as it isn't defined with RDFS but uses its own, looser description > mechanisms such as schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes. So what > I'm really looking for is a solution that would work in general, not just > for some vocabularies. > [...] > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > I would like to see some firm definition of just how these looser description mechanisms actually work. peter
Received on Sunday, 30 March 2014 01:11:22 UTC