- From: Justin Boyan <jaboyan@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:46:44 +0000
- To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net, public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CABJSzUsmjHMRmuYsYwVWJkYCr1WG9asr9M6-G5PJ=pnTSoL43A@mail.gmail.com>
I was thinking of government-related events open to the public like town meetings, school board meetings, open legislative sessions, etc. On Wed Jun 25 2014 at 1:22:34 PM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > Out of curiosity - what would be the definition of "CivicEvent"? Does it > mean a publicly open event? A local government sponsored event? A > city-wide event? > > kc > > On 6/25/14, 5:51 AM, Justin Boyan wrote: > > I think adding a 'host' or 'organizer' property alongside attendee and > > performer on schema.org/Event <http://schema.org/Event> would make > > sense. I also think adding a new subtype, say, schema.org/CivicEvent > > <http://schema.org/CivicEvent>, is a no-brainer. The accessibility and > > amenities issues should be considered more broadly - and perhaps they go > > with the Place rather than the Event. Finally, IMO, issuesToAddress is > > unlikely to be used consistently as a structured field so that data > > should probably just be part of the event description. > > > > Justin > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014, 5:31 AM, Albert Willis <alwillis@mac.com > > <mailto:alwillis@mac.com>> wrote: > > > > Working on a project and I need to markup meetings of community > > members of a city or neighborhood to address a civic issue and > > nothing in http://schema.org/Event fits. > > > > Ideally, I’d like a version of Event with the following changes: > > > > * instead of a performer, it would be a convener (or host) which > > would be a Person or Organization > > * instead of workPerformed, it would be issuesToAddress (something > > that’s not a CreativeWork) > > * markup to indicate if an RSVP is required > > * a contactPoint for the meeting (like we see in > > http://schema.org/Organization) for RSVPs or additional > information > > * markup for amenities offered (food, child care) to make it more > > convenient for people to attend > > * should be able to specify whether the location has affordances > > for people in wheelchairs, etc. > > * should be able to indicate if there will be translation > > available for non-native speakers > > * should be able to indicate whether sign language for deaf people > > will be available > > > > > > Most of the meetings I attend are hosted by ad hoc or temporary > > entities (committees, working groups, etc.) that aren’t formal > > Organizations, so the http://schema.org/Organization markup doesn’t > > work well for that either, but that’s another issue. > > > > In the short term, any suggestions for a combination of markup I > > could use to indicate some of these attributes? > > > > Longer term, I’m happy to participate in a process for new > > schema.org <http://schema.org> vocabulary to address these issues. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > — Al > > > > > > --- > > Al Willis > > alwillis@mac.com <mailto:alwillis@mac.com> > > > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet > >
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 21:47:12 UTC