- From: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 14:15:08 -0400
- To: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
- Cc: PublicVocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 01:58:27PM -0400, Vicki Tardif Holland wrote: >Sites like www.musicbrainz.org provide a wealth of information about music >artists and recordings, but the sparseness of music-related schema.org >schema limits the ability for these sites to fully describe their data. The >following proposal for new music-related properties and types was developed >through collaboration with the MusicBrainz project and partially inspired >by the MusicBrainz and Music Ontology schemas. > >Some work remains to synchronize with the proposal out of the Bib Extend >Community group. In the meantime, please see the attached PDF or the test >build pages: >http://sdo-music.appspot.com/MusicComposition >http://sdo-music.appspot.com/MusicGroup >http://sdo-music.appspot.com/MusicAlbum >http://sdo-music.appspot.com/MusicRecording >http://sdo-music.appspot.com/StudioAlbum >http://sdo-music.appspot.com/AlbumRelease Looks quite good in general, given a quick skim read. It looks like MusicComposition will work reasonalbly well for a written score, which is nice! One quick note: the proposed http://schema.org/genre already exists with the definition "Genre of the creative work"; how about changing the proposal so that the definition of "genre" simply becomes something like "Genre of the creative work or group" with a correspondingly widened domain?
Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 18:15:40 UTC