- From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:53:33 +0200
- To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- Cc: "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADK2AU1a_yPOrKUeyGsZpP8CFKnZmZrcZbdgQY+NxBhT2L1DYQ@mail.gmail.com>
+1 Now I recently did some promotional markup for a G+ Hangout On Air episode and noticed there isn't anything to describe so called 'webisodes'. Something which could also be of interest for internet only series, like for example 'Sanctuary' - which started as an internet only broadcasted show, before it was picked by television. So I suggest to also add something like BroadcastSeries>OnlineSeries 2014-06-13 11:58 GMT+02:00 Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>: > A couple of recent threads have highlighted the current very > TV/Radio-ness of the Series <http://schema.org/Series> Type. Hardly > surprising considering the proposal it came from. > > It seems that it would be better if Series became a generic Type with > more focussed sub-types such as TVSeries, RadioSeries, GameSeries, > MovieSeries, LiterarySeries, etc. > > Looking at the current TV/Radio Series structure, this might be best > handled by the introduction of a BroadcastSeries Type to serve the current > purpose of Series, which then would be replaced by a more generic Series > Type definition: > > CreativeWork>Series>BroadcastSeries>TVSeries > CreativeWork>Series>BroadcastSeries>RadioSeries > CreativeWork>Series>LiterarySeries > CreativeWork>Series>MovieSeries > CreativeWork>Series>>GameSeries > etc. > > > > ~Richard > > -- *Jarno van Driel* Technical & Semantic SEO Consultant 8 Digits - Digital Marketing Technologies Tel: +31 652 847 608 Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JarnovanDriel Linkedin: linkedin.com/pub/jarno-van-driel/75/470/36a/
Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 10:54:00 UTC