Re: Schema.org v1.6 release candidate: Roles, various fixes, site navigation improvements

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Sam Goto <goto@google.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>
>> +Sam, Jason
>>
>> On 10 June 2014 00:04, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Great!  Please note the content of:
>> > http://sdopending.appspot.com/asset
>>
>> Ah, thanks. The property 'asset' didn't exist, except it is mentioned
>> in http://sdopending.appspot.com/distance
>>
>> (aside: the reason that link doesn't have a normal 404 page is because
>> 'asset' is now minimally mentioned in the RDFS configuration file
>> where 'distance' is defined; I'll add QA tests to catch this kind of
>> thing - i.e. terms that have no rdfs:comment, or multiple
>> rdfs:comments)
>>
>>     <div typeof="rdf:Property" resource="http://schema.org/distance">
>>       <span class="h" property="rdfs:label">distance</span>
>>       <span property="rdfs:comment">A sub property of asset. The
>> distance travelled.</span>
>>       <link property="rdfs:subPropertyOf" href="http://schema.org/asset"
>> />
>>     ...etc
>>    </div>
>>
>> http://schema.org/distance "A sub property of asset. The distance
>> travelled."
>>
>> Sam, Jason - looks like there was expected to be an 'asset' property
>> on Action, at some point. I find it hard to see how the notion of
>> asset applies naturally to a 'distance' on an exercise or travel
>> action.
>>
>> I suggest:
>>
>> 1. We drop the phrase "A sub property of asset." from
>> http://schema.org/distance.
>>
>
> (1) SGTM
>

I mean (1) AND (2) SGTM.


>
>
>> 2. I delete the assertion that 'distance' has a superproperty 'asset'.
>>
>> How does that sound?
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> There is a temporary review build of schema.org v1.6 for your
>> >> consideration.
>>
>
>