- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 16:02:55 -0700
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- CC: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
On 06/07/2014 03:33 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 7 June 2014 23:23, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: >> The subPropertyOf is not there now, right? >> >> I couldn't find it in http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html which >> currently reads [...] > > Correct - the various *.appspot.com versions of schema.org floating > around here are all experimental works in progress. The current (v1.5) > schema.org site has a prose-only notion of sub-properties. > >> This appears to be a significant change to schema.org, as Guha has said that >> "[t]here is no organization of properties" >> [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Oct/0267.html]. > > A sub-property structure was used in the Action-related vocabulary > since last year,but yes this is the first time it has been integrated > into the navigation structure of the site (or written out explicitly > in triples). The idea with Actions was motivated in part from > experience with the earlier Activity Streams format, and a desire to > allow more customised terminology for different kinds of > actions/activities. So a property hierarchy has sort of been in schema.org since 10 August 2013. >> Will it interact with schema.org domains and ranges in the way that I >> suggested in >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Jan/0025.html > > Could you couch the question in the terms of a concrete example? Is is possible for the expected type of object to be Person and the expected type of collection (a subproperty of action) to be Thing? > cheers, > > Dan peter
Received on Saturday, 7 June 2014 23:03:27 UTC