On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking good! A number of comments on specific types and properties.
>
> > elf Pavlik perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org via listhub.w3.org
> > What do you think about
> > adding schema:GameCharacter extending schema:Person
>
> +1 for some version of this (I would opt for the Game property "character"
> which would have the expected type "Person").
>
But a fictional character isn't a subclass of Person, it's something
entirely different. In other schema.org contexts this is modeled as
https://schema.org/characterName which, being a simple string, isn't very
satisfying, but at least it isn't wrong the in the way that extending
Person is.
Tom