- From: Kévin Dunglas <dunglas@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 14:14:42 +0100
- To: PublicVocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOv1iQaKbxX0L2Agmbw-NbAOdSgQPYuXsBO1yvfa6PNzBRk-nw@mail.gmail.com>
Another (better?) solution is to create new types extending Offer with no new property like: - Thing > Intangible > Offer > DiscountOffer - Thing > Intangible > Offer > SaleOffer Martin, what do you think of this proposal? 2014-01-26 11:10 GMT+01:00 Kévin Dunglas <dunglas@gmail.com>: > Some countries have specials regulations for sales. E.g. in France, a > sale must be explicitly differentiated of regular discounts and the > price of a sale must be lesser than the lower price in the past month. > > To let softwares easily determine if an offer is a sale or not, I > propose to add the following property to http://schema.org/Offer: > > Property | Expected type | Description > sale | Boolean | This offer is a sale > > For clarity (and to easily distinguish sales from discounts) I also > propose to add the following property: > > Property | Expected type | Description > discount | Boolean | This offer is a discount > -- > Kévin Dunglas > > http://dunglas.fr > -- Kévin Dunglas http://dunglas.fr
Received on Saturday, 15 February 2014 13:15:34 UTC