- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:28:00 +1000
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
On 12/19/2014 11:16, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > > Anyway, how about, this little tweak: > > @prefix spin <http://spinrdf.org/spin#> . > > <#property> > rdfs:label "Property"; > rdfs:comment "An Attribute of a Class, where each Attribute is a > Name=Value pairing."; > rdfs:subPropertyOf spin:constraint . > > schema:MedicalEntity > a rdfs:Class ; > rdfs:subClassOf schema:Thing ; > <#property> [ > <#predicate> schema:code ; > <#valueType> schema:MedicalCode ; > rdfs:label "code" ; > rdfs:comment "A medical code for the > entity, taken from a controlled vocabulary or ontology > such as ICD-9, > DiseasesDB, MeSH, SNOMED-CT, RxNorm, etc." > ] . Yes this is technically possible, yet to be considered as input for a W3C standard, the proposed vocabulary would be its own language and not "just" an extension to SPIN. (For a complete SPIN mapping, the values of :property would also require an rdf:type, which here is "inferred" to be :PropertyConstraint). I will publish the full write-up of what I propose in January once the W3C shapes group has made progress with the requirements phase [1]. Holger [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Requirements
Received on Friday, 19 December 2014 01:31:08 UTC