- From: Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 09:17:59 +0000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- CC: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, "Jason Johnson (BING)" <jasjoh@microsoft.com>, "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
That would be fine by me. ~Richard On 15 Aug 2014, at 11:04, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > On 14 August 2014 22:02, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote: >> Good progress. >> >> Coming from a community (the library folks) where selling things is not a >> natural modus operandi, can I make an appeal to slightly broaden the >> definition of ‘seller’ to emphasise the point that it may not be a financial >> transaction being contemplated. >> >> Something like: …. The seller may sell, offer, lease, lend or loan goods and services …. > > How about "An entity which offers (sells / leases / lends / loans) the > services / goods. A seller may also be a provider." ? (Jason's > suggestion, which looks good to me) > > Dan
Received on Friday, 15 August 2014 09:18:38 UTC