W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > August 2014

Re: ItemList examples

From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 20:14:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CADK2AU3Nxj9W2ckBpntn4rm2sukhaZmYB9a-Xe=uW_z6jxTCag@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
Cc: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
And it now also shows an example of a paginated ItemList, or at least the
way I can imagine it. No need to be nice about it though if I'm wrong with
this.


2014-08-08 19:24 GMT+02:00 Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>:

> "Sounds like an obvious simple way forward to me!"
>
>
> Thanks for the support.
>
> I've also been busy writing my own thoughts down about the matter. I hope
> it helps:
>
> 1] Introduce new properties for CreativeWork so it (and it's subClasses)
> can express they are (part of) a 'collection' of sorts, thus keeping
> ItemList an editorial work:
>     1] previous = <ol start> = Text / URI / CreativeWork
>     2] next = <ol> resolved by DOM = Text / URI / CreativeWork
>     3] end = <ol> (implied if there is no @start) = Text / URI /
> CreativeWork
>     4] position = <li value="7"> = Text / Number (unclear whether this
> should be Integer instead)
> 2] Introduce 'hasPart' (with domain of CreativeWork and a range of Thing)
> 3] Deprecate al versions of *Part* in favor of using 'isPartOf'
> 4] Deprecate al versions of *num* in favor of using 'numberOf'
>
> More details can be found on:
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/ChainingLayoutElements#Food_for_thought_for_the_WebPageElement_.2F_ItemList_.2F_Collection_discussions
>
>
> 2014-08-08 17:57 GMT+02:00 Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>:
>
> Sounds like an obvious simple way forward to me!
>>
>> Avoids all that messing about with the Role-style indirection that we
>> have been discussing.
>>
>> And would result in cleaner clearer markup
>>
>>
>> ~Richard
>>
>>
>> On 8 Aug 2014, at 11:22, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I have a quick question (I'm working on something)...
>> >
>> > As a Multi-Type Entity isn't considered anything strange for something
>> like 'a Service being offered' [Product, Service]. Instead of 'ListItem >
>> item > Thing', could we not just use a MTE to define the ListItem
>> [ListItem, Thing]?
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Friday, 8 August 2014 18:14:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:34 UTC