W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > August 2014

Re: Why aren't all enumerations shown in the full types list?

From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:13:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CADK2AU1Ftc01EeLqoiPnPVHWO9qxioDr2u3aYAyhqS-ZLaHg9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Oh, I really was just talking about the types. And I actually thought there
was some sort of a smart reason, that I didn't get, that the list doesn't
all of of the types. But if not, then I'm happy I said something.


2014-08-07 10:01 GMT+02:00 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>:

> On 7 August 2014 03:10, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I just realized there are a lot of enumerations which aren't shown in
> > http://schema.org/docs/full.html.
> >
> > Take http://schema.org/MedicalSpecialty or
> > http://schema.org/ItemAvailability for example. they have a list of
> > enumeration members that aren't showing in the full types list.
> >
> > Any reason why, doesn't it make them hard to be discovered?
>
> Maybe 'full' is the wrong word, since that page doesn't show
> properties either - only types. But point noted!
>
> Dan
>
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2014 08:13:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:34 UTC