- From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:13:02 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2014 08:13:29 UTC
Oh, I really was just talking about the types. And I actually thought there was some sort of a smart reason, that I didn't get, that the list doesn't all of of the types. But if not, then I'm happy I said something. 2014-08-07 10:01 GMT+02:00 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>: > On 7 August 2014 03:10, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com> wrote: > > I just realized there are a lot of enumerations which aren't shown in > > http://schema.org/docs/full.html. > > > > Take http://schema.org/MedicalSpecialty or > > http://schema.org/ItemAvailability for example. they have a list of > > enumeration members that aren't showing in the full types list. > > > > Any reason why, doesn't it make them hard to be discovered? > > Maybe 'full' is the wrong word, since that page doesn't show > properties either - only types. But point noted! > > Dan >
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2014 08:13:29 UTC