Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work?

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:33:22AM +0200, wrote:
>In general, I am supportive of this, since any entity could "have" a video.
>But of course you can also model it the other way round:
> ---> about --> Thing
>This works as of now. The main problem with the current solution is
>that search engines seem to have a hard time honoring information in
>that structure. And since we have the property "image" at the level of
>, why not promote video thereto, too?

It's a bit of a slippery slope; "audio" will undoubtedly be next,
suggesting that we need a property that can accept any MediaObject.

And then MedicalProcedure will need to link to an associated Diet and
ExercisePlan (which are CreativeWorks). Really, "followup" having a
range limited to Text is...  pretty limiting.

So perhaps Thing just needs a property that accepts a range of
CreativeWork to provide this direction of linking? Horribly generic, I


Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2014 13:59:54 UTC