Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties

we also had several important properties grouped at the top coming from
Thing (name, description, image, url, additionalName), here is how it used
to look a few months back:
http://www.slideshare.net/scorlosquet/drupal-searchseobadcamp13/18. They
have been moved to the bottom of the list, was this change intentional?

Also, I believe we used to have more information (e.g. breadcrumbs I
think?) at the top of property pages, e.g. http://schema.org/colleague

Steph.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>wrote:

> I just noticed that the stacking order of Types and their properties has
> been reversed.  i.e.. Thing is now at the bottom.
>
> Confused at first - finding the Type [being viewed] specific properties at
> the top.
>
> But already liking it.
>
> ~Richard
>
> On 4 Apr 2014, at 15:59, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:16:32PM +0100, Dan Brickley wrote:
> >> First up: I've just pushed a new version of the site with fixes for a)
> >> missing acknowledgements b) proper titles c) the
> >> supertypes/breadcrumbs problem.
> >>
> >> Does http://schema.org/NewsArticle look better?
> >
> > It certainly does! (Aside: this particular page needs an example, which
> > would hopefully *ahem* show why headline/alternativeHeadline are
> > needed in addition to name/alternateName and how they should be used,
> > but the need for examples on this page predates the new version of the
> > site...)
> >
> >> There are a few more little things to fix asap but we wanted to cut
> >> over to the new site asap to make releases easier...
> >
> > One more thing I noticed: I'm currently getting a 404 for
> > http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html (which is still linked from
> > http://schema.org/docs/datamodel.html).
> >
> > Oh, and one more one more thing: while I appreciate that the
> > single-line-of-HTML approach for the property tables saves a few
> > transfer bytes, it would be a lot easier to diff versions if there were
> > linefeeds for each <tr>. That said, if it doesn't happen we can always
> > handle that on the client side :)
> >
> > Related to the previous paragraph, trying to mirror the site so that I
> > can check for significant changes with "wget --mirror" results in a lot
> > of "405 method not allowed" errors. Again, these last two issues won't
> > affect most people, so you can obviously consider them a very low
> > priority :)
> >
> > Thanks again, Dan!
> >
>
>
>
>


-- 
Steph.