public-vocabs@w3.org from April 2014 by date

Wednesday, 30 April 2014

• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org Mike Bergman
• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org Jarno van Driel
• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org Jason Douglas
• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org Justin Boyan
• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: When to use UserComments rather than Comment class? Jocelyn Fournier
• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org Francois-Paul Servant

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org Jarno van Driel
• Generic Property-Value Proposal for Schema.org martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org

Monday, 28 April 2014

• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Jarno van Driel
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Jocelyn Fournier
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Jarno van Driel
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Jocelyn Fournier

Friday, 25 April 2014

• CFP: 1st Workshop on Linked Data Quality (LDQ 2014) Magnus Knuth

Thursday, 24 April 2014

• Re: schema.org 1.2 typos: patch Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 23 April 2014

• schema.org 1.2 typos: patch Dan Scott

Monday, 21 April 2014

• Re: has, is, of Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: has, is, of Karen Coyle
• Re: has, is, of KANZAKI Masahide
• Re: has, is, of martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org

Sunday, 20 April 2014

• Re: has, is, of Karen Coyle
• Re: has, is, of Thad Guidry
• Re: Duplicate property listings in schema.org RDFS Dan Brickley
• Duplicate property listings in schema.org RDFS Dan Scott
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Jarno van Driel
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Dan Scott
• Re: has, is, of Jarno van Driel
• Re: has, is, of Martin Hepp
• Re: has, is, of Dan Scott
• Re: has, is, of Jarno van Driel
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Jarno van Driel
• has, is, of Karen Coyle
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Dan Scott
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Jarno van Driel
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Thad Guidry
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Wallis,Richard
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Jarno van Driel

Friday, 18 April 2014

• Re: any idea for Plural, Singular, gender properties to add on a skos-xl:label Simon Spero
• Re: any idea for Plural, Singular, gender properties to add on a skos-xl:label jean delahousse
• Re: any idea for Plural, Singular, gender properties to add on a skos-xl:label jean delahousse
• Re: Schema.org v. 1.2. published, adding Potential Actions vocabulary. John Domingue
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Kevin Polley

Thursday, 17 April 2014

• Re: any idea for Plural, Singular, gender properties to add on a skos-xl:label Simon Spero
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Jocelyn Fournier
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Jarno van Driel
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Jason Douglas
• Re: working of schema.org/WebPage Jarno van Driel
• working of schema.org/WebPage Jason Douglas
• working of schema.org/WebPage Jarno van Driel
• any idea for Plural, Singular, gender properties to add on a skos-xl:label jean delahousse
• Re: Book review site microdata Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Book review site microdata Dan Brickley
• Book review site microdata B.M. Allen

Wednesday, 16 April 2014

• Re: Schema.org v. 1.2. published, adding Potential Actions vocabulary. Adrian Giurca
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Schema.org v. 1.2. published, adding Potential Actions vocabulary. Thad Guidry
• Re: Schema.org v. 1.2. published, adding Potential Actions vocabulary. Dan Brickley
• Re: Schema.org v. 1.2. published, adding Potential Actions vocabulary. martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Schema.org v. 1.2. published, adding Potential Actions vocabulary. Simon Spero
• Re: Schema.org v. 1.2. published, adding Potential Actions vocabulary. Dan Brickley
• Re: Schema.org v. 1.2. published, adding Potential Actions vocabulary. martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Schema.org v. 1.2. published, adding Potential Actions vocabulary. Dan Brickley

Tuesday, 15 April 2014

• Re: When to use UserComments rather than Comment class? Jocelyn Fournier
• RE: Schema.org site update - fixed examples Markus Lanthaler
• Schema.org site update - fixed examples Dan Brickley

Monday, 14 April 2014

• Re: Inverse properties, was: Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Jarno van Driel
• Re: Inverse properties, was: Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Inverse properties, was: Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Inverse properties, was: Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: schema.org Roles design Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Inverse properties, was: Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Inverse properties, was: Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Inverse properties, was: Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Inverse properties, was: Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Tourism Library martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• RE: Tourism Library Birnou Sébarte
• Re: Tourism Library Martin Hepp
• Tourism Library Birnou Sébarte
• Re: Inverse properties Alex
• Re: Inverse properties, was: Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Dan Brickley
• ESWC 2014 Students Participation Support speroni@cs.unibo.it
• Re: Inverse properties, was: Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Inverse properties Jarno van Driel
• Re: Inverse properties, was: Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: Inverse properties Dan Brickley
• Re: Inverse properties, was: Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Thad Guidry
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships Pat Hayes
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Simon Spero
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Young,Jeff (OR)
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Thad Guidry
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen

Sunday, 13 April 2014

• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Thad Guidry
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships Luca Matteis
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships Simon Spero
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Wes Turner
• Re: VisualArtwork Paul Watson
• Inverse properties, was: Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Karen Coyle
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships Luca Matteis
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships Ruben Verborgh

Saturday, 12 April 2014

• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Thad Guidry
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Wes Turner
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Wes Turner
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Thad Guidry
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Jarno van Driel
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Wes Turner
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Jarno van Driel
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Justin Boyan
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Adrian Giurca
• Extending SoftwareApplication (and schema.org/Project) Wes Turner
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Wes Turner

Friday, 11 April 2014

• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Aaron Bradley
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Aaron Bradley
• Re: Relationship between People and Social Network Services Thad Guidry
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Contd: Relationship between People and Social Network Services Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Thad Guidry
• Re: Potentials Actions - We Think We're Done Dan Brickley
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Jarno van Driel
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Justin Boyan
• Relationship between People and Social Network Services Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Thad Guidry
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Justin Boyan
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Jarno van Driel
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Thad Guidry
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Wallis,Richard
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Why does 'category' expect PhysicalActivityCategory? martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org

Thursday, 10 April 2014

• Why does 'category' expect PhysicalActivityCategory? Stefan Götz

Friday, 11 April 2014

• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Dan Brickley
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Dan Brickley
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Martin Hepp
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Mike Bergman
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Karen Coyle

Thursday, 10 April 2014

• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Wallis,Richard
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kevin Marks
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Adrian Giurca
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Adrian Giurca
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Charles McCathie Nevile
• RE: Potentials Actions - We Think We're Done Markus Lanthaler

Wednesday, 9 April 2014

• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Aaron Bradley
• Re: VisualArtwork Thad Guidry
• Re: VisualArtwork Paul Watson
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Wallis,Richard
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Dan Scott
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Dan Scott
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Karen Coyle
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Niklas Lindström
• Re: Bibliography Annotations (WAS Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal) Adrian Giurca
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Niklas Lindström
• Re: Bibliography Annotations (WAS Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal) Karen Coyle
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Thad Guidry
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Adrian Giurca
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Thad Guidry
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Dan Scott
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Karen Coyle
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Thad Guidry
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Dan Brickley
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Jarno van Driel
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Thad Guidry
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Dan Brickley
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Jason Douglas
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Jason Douglas
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization David Deering
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization Dan Brickley
• Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal Gregg Kellogg
• Bibliography Annotations (WAS Re: Citation markup with Periodical proposal) Adrian Giurca
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships Ruben Verborgh
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Citation markup with Periodical proposal Karen Coyle
• Re: Potentials Actions - We Think We're Done Sam Goto
• Last Call for Papers: EC-WEB 2014 - The 15th International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies Martin Hepp
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Jarno van Driel

Tuesday, 8 April 2014

• RE: Potentials Actions - We Think We're Done Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Thad Guidry
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Thad Guidry
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Laura Dawson
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Jarno van Driel
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Vicki Tardif Holland
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Jarno van Driel
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Dan Brickley
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Jarno van Driel
• Re: schema.org property proposal: workPerformed Karen Coyle
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Jarno van Driel
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Laura Dawson
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Dan Brickley
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Laura Dawson
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Dan Scott
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Dan Scott
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Jarno van Driel
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? Jarno van Driel
• Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work? martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• Re: schema.org property proposal: workPerformed Dan Scott
• Re: VisualArtwork Karen Coyle
• Re: schema.org property proposal: workPerformed Karen Coyle
• Why is the video property bound to creative work? Jarno van Driel
• Re: schema.org property proposal: socialAccount David Deering
• Re: schema.org property proposal: socialAccount Thad Guidry
• Re: schema.org property proposal: socialAccount Aaron Bradley

Monday, 7 April 2014

• Re: schema.org property proposal: socialAccount Jarno van Driel
• Re: Inference for error checking [was Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships] Gannon Dick
• RE: Periodical proposal Young,Jeff (OR)
• Re: Periodical proposal Wallis,Richard
• Potentials Actions - We Think We're Done Jason Johnson (BING)
• Re: Periodical proposal Dan Scott
• VisualArtwork (was: schema.org property proposal: workPerformed) Dan Scott
• Re: Periodical proposal Niklas Lindström
• Re: schema.org property proposal: workPerformed Niklas Lindström
• Re: schema.org property proposal: socialAccount Wallis,Richard
• Re: schema.org property proposal: socialAccount Kevin Polley
• Re: Periodical proposal Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org property proposal: socialAccount Martin Hepp
• Periodical proposal Karen Coyle
• Re: schema.org property proposal: socialAccount Thad Guidry
• Re: Inference for error checking [was Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships] David Booth
• Re: Inference for error checking [was Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships] Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 6 April 2014

• Re: schema.org property proposal: socialAccount Jarno van Driel
• Re: schema.org property proposal: workPerformed Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org property proposal: socialAccount Dan Brickley
• Re: Discovering the full schema.org vocabulary (Was: Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: schema.org property proposal: socialAccount Adrian Giurca
• schema.org property proposal: workPerformedEvent Dan Brickley
• schema.org property proposal: socialAccount Dan Brickley
• Re: Discovering the full schema.org vocabulary (Was: Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties) Dan Brickley
• Re: Discovering the full schema.org vocabulary (Was: Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Discovering the full schema.org vocabulary (Was: Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties) Dan Brickley
• Re: Discovering the full schema.org vocabulary (Was: Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Niklas Lindström
• Discovering the full schema.org vocabulary (Was: Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties) Niklas Lindström

Saturday, 5 April 2014

• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Niklas Lindström
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Niklas Lindström
• Re: clinical entities - structures Marc Twagirumukiza
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Gregg Kellogg

Friday, 4 April 2014

• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Dan Brickley
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Dan Brickley
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Aaron Bradley
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Bernard Vatant
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Dan Brickley
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Wallis,Richard
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Jarno van Driel
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Dan Scott
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Dan Scott
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Jarno van Driel
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Wallis,Richard
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Dan Brickley
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Dan Scott
• Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Stéphane Corlosquet
• Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties Dan Brickley

Thursday, 3 April 2014

• Re: Inference for error checking [was Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships] David Booth
• Re: Renaming http://schema.org/action to http://schema.org/muscleAction martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
• ESWC 2014 Second Call for EU Project Networking speroni@cs.unibo.it
• Re: Renaming http://schema.org/action to http://schema.org/muscleAction Thad Guidry
• Renaming http://schema.org/action to http://schema.org/muscleAction Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa Lite vs RDFa full support (was: schema.org Roles design) Dan Brickley
• RDFa Lite vs RDFa full support (was: schema.org Roles design) Dan Scott
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: schema.org Roles design Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: schema.org Roles design Dan Scott
• Re: Inference for error checking [was Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships] Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 2 April 2014

• Re: Inference for error checking [was Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ANN: WebDataCommons releases 17.2 billion quads RDFa, Microdata and Microformat data originating from 1.7 million pay-level-domains Christian Bizer

Tuesday, 1 April 2014

• Re: Commercial @Service vs Commercial @MedicalProcedure - how to mark it up correct? Chilly Bang
• Re: A rule of thumb for cross-posting public-vocabs with other lists Stéphane Corlosquet

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2014 23:47:03 UTC