- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:12:35 -0400
- To: Chilly_Bang <chilly_bang@yahoo.de>
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAGR+nnHJ4DAtznGx7ncPd5Hp6RSkXt8aHSeGV5Q5xwGXttWA3g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi! On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Chilly_Bang <chilly_bang@yahoo.de> wrote: > Hello to all! > > Why are properties "about" and "mentions" allowed to be a Thing, but > "keywords" only a text? > Thanks for raising this point, I was going to ask the same question. Many systems natively exposes keywords / tags as entities. In the case of Drupal for example, each keyword has a page which lists all the content on the site tagged with that same keyword. See example [1] showing all content tagged with the "non-profit" keyword. The current description of keywords reads "The keywords/tags used to describe this content.". To me it feels like we're encouraging authors to put all keywords into one single plain text value. How are the keywords separated? comma, space, tab? Each keyword is text, no way to identify each with a URI. As pointed out by evgeniy, a lot of other properties of schema.org are allowed to be a Thing, Person, Organization... Could we update the range (expected type) of 'keywords' to be 'Thing'? Could we make 'keywords' singular, and also update its description to "A keyword or tag used to describe this content.". I've added this proposal to the list of pending singularity proposals [2]. Steph. [1] http://buytaert.net/tag/non-profit [2] http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Singularity#Candidate_list_of_additions_.2F_changes_2
Received on Friday, 14 June 2013 02:13:04 UTC