Re: schema.org 1.0b update

On 24 July 2013 18:10, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Some of you already noticed, so here's a quick summary.
>>
>> We've just posted a new version of the schema.org site.
>>
>> It has two vocabulary changes:
>>
>> 1. addition of http://schema.org/sameAs
>>
>> Per http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/sameAs this adds a property to
>> Thing that makes it easier to indicate identifying URLs for entities
>> being described.
>>
>> 2. http://schema.org/citation has been moved up to CreativeWork, from
>> MedicalScholarlyArticle
>>
>> Details http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/CitationPromotion
>>
>> Thanks to the BibExtend group for suggesting this small but useful
>> improvement.
>>
>>
>> The site also has some practical improvements:
>>
>> 1. schema.org now has per-property pages.
>>
>> I'm happy to close this longstanding issue,
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/2
>>
>> Every property in schema.org should now de-reference. For example,
>> http://schema.org/actor or the links above for
>> http://schema.org/sameAs and http://schema.org/citation. This is
>> currently quite basic but should be useful in a number of ways. It
>> helps with property-centric schemas such as LRMI (e.g.
>> http://schema.org/learningResourceType ) and provides a foundation for
>> publishing other useful pieces of information about each property
>> (source/attribution, mappings, inverses and super-properties etc.).
>>
>> 2. Per-term machine-readable definitions
>>
>> Our Type, Enumeration and the new Property pages each have basic
>> embedded RDFa/RDFS schema descriptions. We continue to publish a full
>> RDFa/RDFS dump of the schema at
>> http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html and are considering other
>> improvements (JSON-LD, OWL, change logs / history, etc.).
>
>
> Congrats on the launch of the individual property pages and the RDFa/RDFS
> schema everywhere! Is http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html to be
> taken as the canonical structured data dump of schema.org in RDFS? It
> mentions that it's 'experimental', maybe this is no longer the case?

You are right; there was another small fix. Instead of the
experimental 'domain' and 'range' properties, it now uses
http://schema.org/domainIncludes and http://schema.org/rangeIncludes

Dan

Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2013 16:18:53 UTC