- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:30:40 -0500
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 14:31:09 UTC
Actually, Dan, the BibExtend group is quite torn about FRBR-like models, > with a good part of the group (perhaps the majority) opposed to introducing > the concepts into schema.org. > Just for the record, I would be OPPOSED to FRBR-like models introduced into schema.org (It would defeat our goals and original intent concerning simplicity for the developer, a bit) -- -Thad Thad on Freebase.com <http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 14:31:09 UTC