- From: Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:33:19 -0500
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACfEFw_6h7PW6uAZhbw5Yzw-25qdMROb0bCtwLhL60zOi9nbcA@mail.gmail.com>
> I believe the suggested routes for an extension would be to > either or both: > > a) Define the openingHours property in your own vocabulary and then mix > it in using RDFa Lite. While quick, I'm not sure which schema.org/RDFa services would support such a custom property. > b) Put together a proposal to add it to schema.org proper so that you > eventually don't have to maintain your own vocabulary. > > I suspect doing (a) strengthens (b), particularly if it's a common case. > > (Aside: I'm relatively new to the extensions idea myself. I recently > stumbled over the deprecation of "/" after spending a day or so > implementing a proof-of-concept with it, and so am motivated to try and > help get http://schema.org/docs/extension.html updated to a consensus > position on best practices for extending schema.org) > These may also be useful references: * http://www.w3.org/wiki/SchemaDotOrgProcess * http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals * https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/file/default/schema.org/drafts/alpha
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 14:33:46 UTC