public-vocabs@w3.org from July 2013 by date

Wednesday, 31 July 2013

• Re: Nature of change in Schema.org Dan Brickley
• Sustainable governance for long-term preservation of RDF Vocabularies Bernard Vatant
• Nature of change in Schema.org Jindřich Mynarz
• Re: Proposal: Collection Wallis,Richard

Tuesday, 30 July 2013

• Re: Offer data in separate places in HTML Francois-Paul Servant
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Francois-Paul Servant
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Francois-Paul Servant
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Francois-Paul Servant
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Francois-Paul Servant
• Re: Expected type(s) for email should include URL Jarno van Driel
• Re: Ease of adoption Martin Hepp
• Re: Corpus Statistics Martin Hepp
• Re: Expected type(s) for email should include URL Martin Hepp
• Corpus Statistics John Flynn
• Re: Ease of adoption Wes Turner
• Re: Expected type(s) for email should include URL Robert Schroeder
• Re: Ease of adoption Dawson, Laura
• Re: Ease of adoption Dawson, Laura

Monday, 29 July 2013

• Re: Expected type(s) for email should include URL Jarno van Driel
• Re: Expected type(s) for email should include URL Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Expected type(s) for email should include URL Aaron Bradley
• Re: Expected type(s) for email should include URL Cosmin Paun
• Re: schema.org growth what are the limits? Martin Hepp
• Wrong range for comment property Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Expected type(s) for email should include URL Jarno van Driel
• Re: schema.org growth what are the limits? Guha
• Re: extensions and expected values Dan Scott
• Re: extensions and expected values Karen Coyle
• Expected type(s) for email should include URL Aaron Bradley
• Re: extensions and expected values Matt Garrish
• Re: schema.org growth what are the limits? Wes Turner
• Re: Ease of adoption Wes Turner
• Re: Ease of adoption Martin Hepp
• Re: Ease of adoption Martin Hepp
• Re: Ease of adoption Dawson, Laura
• Re: Ease of adoption Martin Hepp
• Re: Ease of adoption Dawson, Laura
• Re: Ease of adoption Dawson, Laura
• Re: Ease of adoption Martin Hepp
• Re: Ease of adoption Dawson, Laura
• Re: Ease of adoption Matt Garrish
• Re: Ease of adoption Dawson, Laura
• Re: Ease of adoption Dave Pawson
• Re: Ease of adoption Dawson, Laura
• Re: Ease of adoption Wes Turner
• Re: Ease of adoption Wes Turner
• Re: Ease of adoption Thad Guidry
• Re: schema.org growth what are the limits? Martin Hepp
• Re: Ease of adoption Martin Hepp
• Re: Ease of adoption Dave Pawson
• Re: Ease of adoption Wes Turner
• Re: schema.org growth what are the limits? Bernard Vatant
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Martin Hepp
• Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review Matthew Kaufman
• Ease of adoption Dave Pawson
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Martin Hepp
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Martin Hepp
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Martin Hepp
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Martin Hepp
• Re: schema.org growth what are the limits? Adrian Giurca
• Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review Adrian Giurca

Sunday, 28 July 2013

• RE: Update: VisualArtwork type proposed in May this year Thanigai Vellore

Friday, 26 July 2013

• Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review Sam Goto
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Francois-Paul Servant

Saturday, 27 July 2013

• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Francois-Paul Servant
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Francois-Paul Servant

Sunday, 28 July 2013

• Re: Proposal: Collection Wallis,Richard
• Re: Update: VisualArtwork type proposed in May this year Dan Brickley
• Re: Update: VisualArtwork type proposed in May this year Paul Watson
• Re: Update: VisualArtwork type proposed in May this year Karen Coyle
• Re: Update: VisualArtwork type proposed in May this year Paul Watson

Saturday, 27 July 2013

• Re: Update: VisualArtwork type proposed in May this year Tom Morris
• Update: VisualArtwork type proposed in May this year Paul Watson

Friday, 26 July 2013

• Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review Wes Turner
• Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review James M Snell
• Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review James M Snell
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Thad Guidry
• Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org growth what are the limits? Karen Coyle
• Re: schema.org growth what are the limits? Dan Brickley
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Thad Guidry
• schema.org growth what are the limits? Bernard Vatant
• Re: extensions and expected values Karen Coyle
• Re: schema.org 1.0b update Bernard Vatant
• Re: Opening hours for ContactPoint Martin Hepp
• Re: Opening hours for ContactPoint Jens Rantil
• extensions and expected values Matt Garrish
• Re: schema.org 1.0b update Martin Hepp
• Re: schema.org 1.0b update Martin Hepp
• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Martin Hepp

Thursday, 25 July 2013

• Re: Vehicles, and customizable products Thad Guidry

Wednesday, 24 July 2013

• Help structuring new website Ben Weiland

Tuesday, 23 July 2013

• Vehicles, and customizable products Francois-Paul Servant

Thursday, 25 July 2013

• Re: schema.org 1.0b update Bernard Vatant

Wednesday, 24 July 2013

• Re: schema.org 1.0b update Thad Guidry
• Re: schema.org 1.0b update Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org 1.0b update Thad Guidry
• Re: schema.org 1.0b update Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org 1.0b update Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Dan Brickley
• schema.org 1.0b update Dan Brickley
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Thad Guidry
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Wallis,Richard
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Karen Coyle
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Thad Guidry
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Karen Coyle
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Karen Coyle
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Dan Scott
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Martin Hepp
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Martin Hepp
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Owen Stephens

Tuesday, 23 July 2013

• Re: Redefine and reuse? Karen Coyle
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Karen Coyle
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Thad Guidry
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Wes Turner
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Karen Coyle
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Thad Guidry
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Karen Coyle
• Re: Schema.org extension proposal for job market Thad Guidry
• Re: Schema.org extension proposal for job market Dan Scott
• Re: Schema.org extension proposal for job market Jindřich Mynarz
• Re: Schema.org extension proposal for job market Thad Guidry
• Re: Schema.org extension proposal for job market Thad Guidry
• Re: Schema.org extension proposal for job market Jindřich Mynarz
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Dan Scott
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Dan Scott
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Dan Brickley
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Thad Guidry
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Dan Brickley
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Karen Coyle
• Re: Redefine and reuse? Dan Brickley

Monday, 22 July 2013

• Re: Redefine and reuse? Martin Hepp
• Redefine and reuse? Karen Coyle
• Re: Extension of the schema.org medical vocabulary Marcus Nitzschke
• Re: Syntax for boolean in schema.org? Dan Scott
• Syntax for boolean in schema.org? Martin Hepp

Friday, 19 July 2013

• Re: Extension of the schema.org medical vocabulary Wes Turner
• Re: Extension of the schema.org medical vocabulary Wes Turner

Thursday, 18 July 2013

• Extension of the schema.org medical vocabulary Marcus Nitzschke
• Re: Opening hours for ContactPoint Martin Hepp
• Re: Opening hours for ContactPoint Wes Turner
• Re: Opening hours for ContactPoint Dan Scott
• Re: geo property removed from PostalAddress? Wes Turner
• Opening hours for ContactPoint Jens Rantil
• Re: geo property removed from PostalAddress? Martin Hepp
• Re: geo property removed from PostalAddress? Cosmin Paun
• geo property removed from PostalAddress? Martin Hepp

Wednesday, 17 July 2013

• Re: Request: id attributes for schema.org types in the "Full Hierarchy" single-page HTML view (full.html) Dan Brickley
• Young investigator positions at the Institute for Computational Biology of Montpellier (France) Clement Jonquet
• Re: Proposal: Collection Wes Turner
• Request: id attributes for schema.org types in the "Full Hierarchy" single-page HTML view (full.html) Wes Turner

Tuesday, 16 July 2013

• Re: Proposal: Collection Niklas Lindström
• Re: Proposal: Collection Wallis,Richard
• Re: Proposal: Collection Niklas Lindström
• Re: Proposal: Collection Wallis,Richard

Monday, 15 July 2013

• Re: How to represent track ordering with MusicRecording? Martin Hepp
• How to represent track ordering with MusicRecording? Holger Knublauch

Saturday, 6 July 2013

• Re: webschema-ISSUE-23 (danbri): No Organization subtype for Non-Profit ☮ elf Pavlik ☮
• Re: webschema-ISSUE-23 (danbri): No Organization subtype for Non-Profit Dan Brickley
• Re: webschema-ISSUE-23 (danbri): No Organization subtype for Non-Profit Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: webschema-ISSUE-23 (danbri): No Organization subtype for Non-Profit Karen Coyle
• webschema-ISSUE-23 (danbri): No Organization subtype for Non-Profit Web Schemas TF Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 3 July 2013

• Re: Open Data Rights Statements Renato Iannella

Tuesday, 2 July 2013

• Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org Khalid Latif
• Re: Open Data Rights Statements Leigh Dodds
• Re: Open Data Rights Statements Andrea Perego
• Re: Proposal:GeoJSON Strainu
• Open Data Rights Statements Leigh Dodds

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 July 2013 20:48:04 UTC