- From: Tarasova, Tatiana <T.Tarasova@uva.nl>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:26:05 +0000
- To: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
- CC: Pierre Andrews <pierre.andrews@gmail.com>, eGov W3C <public-egov-ig@w3.org>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Hi Ghislain, Yes, I think it is a good idea to have an event-based approach to model parliamentary proceedings documents, as each document is indeed an output of an event, the Parliamentary meeting. I am considering it as a future work. For now, I am focusing on how to represent each document. As I already said the previous project, PoliticalMashup, did a great job by making implicit structure and semantics of the Dutch parliamentary proceedings explicit. Since I have not found any specific vocabulary for my needs, I will reuse already identified concepts and will translate them into an RDF model. Best regards, Tatiana ________________________________________ From: Ghislain Atemezing [auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:25 AM To: Tarasova, Tatiana Cc: Pierre Andrews; eGov W3C; public-vocabs@w3.org Subject: Re: vocabularies for parliamentary proceedings Hi, Just my 2cents here... > I would like to clarify better what kind of data I aim to describe in > RDF. I have proceedings documents which are essentially written notes > from the parliamentary meetings. In a nutshell, they are documented > speeches of members of the parliament. Since all parliamentary meetings > have quite strict structure, the proceedings documents implicitly > reflect this structure. For example, each meeting has topics (discussed > in the meeting); speeches are held at the meeting; the name of the > speaker (member of the parliament) is recorded together with her > affiliation; the verbal content of the speeches are held within small > paragraphs. There are other structural elements like scenes and stage > directions. All these structural elements were already extracted from > the proceedings by the PoliticalMashup project [2]. So, what we want to > do now is really "the next step": explicitly define semantics of these > elements and publish the Dutch proceedings as Linked Data. > What happen if you model meetings as "Events" with the "what", "when", "who" views...Let say: -for meetings/event, you could reuse lode onto [linkedevents.org/] for defining different type of meetings -for the "what" view reusing the bibo onto has mentioned -for the "when" view with the time onto and any appropriate -The "who" view will be attached to the agent, role and organization -for the scenes, directions, you could reuse the buildings and room onto [http://vocab.deri.ie/rooms] WDYT? Other pointer of interest: * The project Documents onto [http://vocab.deri.ie/pdo] at DERI. I hope this also helps, Best Ghislain -- Ghislain Atemezing EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department Campus SophiaTech 450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
Received on Sunday, 24 February 2013 16:26:36 UTC