- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:12:25 +0000
- To: Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>
- Cc: Joshua Wulf <jwulf@redhat.com>, public-vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 20 February 2013 09:43, Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de> wrote: > There is no Schema.org TechArticle. Would you like to extend the vocabulary > then use the URI > > http://schema.org/Article/TechArticle It's on its way (real soon now...); still clearing some backlog from last year; http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/TechArticleSchema Dan > -Adrian Giurca > > On 2/20/2013 2:53 AM, Joshua Wulf wrote: >> >> I've started marking up Red Hat documentation with schema.org markup using >> the proposed Technical Article Vocabulary [1]. >> >> Here's what I'm doing at the moment: >> >> <body itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/TechArticle"> >> <meta itemprop="aboutProduct" content="Red Hat Enterprise MRG 2"> >> >> Three questions: >> 1. Is that markup right? >> 2. This is actually a book, the "Installation and Configuration Guide" - >> is this the right vocab/use of the vocab? >> 3. Any suggestions on what I should do next? >> >> [1] http://blog.schema.org/2012/06/newvocabularies-for-technical.html >> >> - Josh >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 13:12:58 UTC