- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:32:18 +0100
- To: "'Alexander Shubin'" <ajax@yandex-team.ru>
- Cc: <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 26 December 2013 14:32:49 UTC
On Monday, December 23, 2013 10:38 AM, Alexander Shubin wrote: > Hi Markus, Jim, > > Thanks a lot for your thorough feedback! I really appreciate your help! > As far as I may conclude from the thread the biggest confusion comes from > @context non-resolution (which I wrote about in the first message). Of > course we do parse and analyze it. But since it's not clear from > validator's output we obviously should improve it. Thanks for the examples > - we'll use them for reference while testing. Is it correct that the most > intuitive way would be expanding property names and values with the > @context, dropping @context itself along with properties not mapped to an > IRI? Yeah, I would say so. > Thanks again for checking our tool! Our primary goal is to help webmasters > with using JSON-LD and prevent possible errors. So the more intuitive and > correct output in validator, the better code on web pages. +1 > > Is this any clearer? I'm more than happy to help where I can (e.g. by > > reviewing new versions of your validator). Just ping me. > > Absolutely! Thanks! > > P.S. BTW you can drop <script> now - it was too annoying :) Cool! -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 26 December 2013 14:32:49 UTC