- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@unibw.de>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:51:33 +0100
- To: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
- Cc: kcoyle@kcoyle.net, SchemaDot Org <public-vocabs@w3.org>
I think there are two separate issues here that we should treat differently:
1. There can be a property that links to a type, and both the type and the property have the same name. I think this can be a valid approach in the current naming scheme inside schema.org. An alternative would be e.g. to use a hasXYZ pattern for such properties; this may reduce ambiguity but is a bit cumbersome in practice.
2. There could be multiple types multiple properties that differ just by the capitalization; such would be bad.
A pragmatic solution would be to add a script to the schema.org-specific deployment environment that spots potential issues of that kind
for element_1 in schema_org:
for element_2 in schema_org:
if element_1.lower() == element_2.lower() && element_1!=element_2:
print "Potential name clash between two elements, %s and %s" % (element_1, element_2)
Martin
On Dec 4, 2013, at 6:26 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote:
>> A question that I have had about this is whether there is any "policy" (to
>> the extent that schema.org has such things) about having a class and a
>> property with the same term, the only difference being the case of the first
>> letter. It strikes me that such a situation could be error prone.... but I
>> don't know if examples already exist in schema.
>
> It's a relatively common pattern; as a sample of what already exists:
>
> * action / Action
> * AggregateRating / aggregateRating
> * Audience / audience
>
> ... just to hit the "A/a" section.
>
--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
twitter: mfhepp
Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 17:52:03 UTC