- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:27:45 -0800
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- CC: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Bernard's proposal reminds me of the discussion that we had in the schemaBibEx group about non-URI identifiers, and the need to say: 1) this is an identifier 2) this is the issuer of the identifier (or some code or string that identifies the identifier type) id: 12345768/h3 1996 idIssuer: USGPO [United States Government Printing Office] It's a different case, yes, but a similar structure. I would think there might be other similar examples. kc On 12/3/13 12:04 PM, Thad Guidry wrote: > Yes Bernard, that helps clarify...thanks! > > +1 for schema.org/Vocabulary <http://schema.org/Vocabulary> (and with > Bernard's very thoughtful definition of WHAT a vocabulary now means in > the 21st century) > > I dispose on others to think about your suggestions and reply back in > this thread and let's see what they think. > > -- > -Thad > +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> > Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/> -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2013 21:28:16 UTC