Re: Proposal for new type : Vocabulary

I thought that was the whole idea behind a "namespace"... a reserved
keyword for the vocabulary ?  (that is produced or definedBy an authority ?)

You need both to make some sense of it all, at times.... a namespace and an
authority who defines it and maintains the vocabulary contained within it.

But it sounds like your asking for something concrete, "link instances"
.... which I am trying to understand but ...ugh... "oncoming Topic
class"... hmm..

Bernard, can you give a quick example ?



On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Bernard Vatant
<bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>wrote:

> Dear all
>
> We're considering adding schema.org markup at lov.okfn.org, and in
> particular in vocabulary description pages, such as
> http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_schema.html.
>
> We can now put each vocabulary in the broad CreativeWork type, but what
> about a more specific "Vocabulary" type, which could be used by any kind of
> reference vocabulary : glossaries, classifications, ontologies, concept
> schemes, subject headings, authorities ...
>
> An extra would be to have a "definedBy" property to link instances of the
> oncoming Topic class to an instance of Vocabulary.
>
> How does that sound?
>
> --
>
> *Bernard Vatant*
> Vocabularies & Data Engineering
> Tel :  + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
>  Skype : bernard.vatant
> http://google.com/+BernardVatant
> --------------------------------------------------------
> *Mondeca*
> 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France
> www.mondeca.com
> Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
-Thad
+ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>