- From: Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 07:22:53 -0800
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACWrOGY13+pzqR_4Ur+jaM4W62AoLeFgPF3WEWJ01ioREJMWZQ@mail.gmail.com>
I like text also. Sounds we're very close to agreement. On Mar 8, 2012 5:22 AM, "Thad Guidry" <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Jason Douglas <jasondouglas@google.com>wrote: > >> Good points. Pointing to Thing for a text value seems inconvenient, but >> maybe shortening contentText to "text" (rather than "content") would be the >> most clear and parallel, so: CreativeWork/audio, CreativeWork/video and >> CreativeWork/text? >> >> -jason >> >> > +1 to Jason's idea. > > If you think about all the possible ways that humans can express > themselves or their feelings... Doing it that way would cover the 3 basic > forms of human expression. But unfortunately the 4th one, "art" itself is > missing a high level placement under CreativeWork/ as well... where > Painting and Sculpture could be placed downstairs on the schema...but I > guess that's ok. And the 5th one, "gestures" (which would include Sign > Language or simple Neanderthal hand poking) is interesting in itself if it > ever appeared on the web. But those would probably take the video form) By > the way, Music as a human expression could be considered mapped under > CreativeWork/audio. > > CreativeWork/text (I like it) > CreativeWork/audio > CreativeWork/video > CreativeWork/art > CreativeWork/gestures (probably never needed, and not generally > considered a CreativeWork but a communication form.) > > -- > -Thad > http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry >
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 15:23:22 UTC