- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:58:36 -0600
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 15:59:08 UTC
My opinion is that Athletes are indeed a sub-type of a Person. You could look at the problem from a different angle as well. Your examples of a horse, robot, etc... would be a different type, such as "Competitors". ESPN simply decided to create their own rule of "ALL COMPETITORS ARE ATHLETES". Nothing wrong with making their own rules within their own namespace, "their website, or TV channel". My rules would say that "ALL ATHLETES ARE PERSONS" and "ALL COMPETITORS COMPETE IN AN SPORTING EVENT" -- -Thad http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 15:59:08 UTC