Re: OGP/schema.org mappings

One last note.  I just remembered why I didn't include, e.g. for the  
COG object type "book", the following triples:

api-book:book owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction; owl:onProperty  
og:type; owl:hasValue "book" . ] .
book:author rdfs:domain api-book:book .
...

The reason is that the subject of such og:type and book:author triples  
is the URL of a webpage (dare I say, information resource).   
Therefore, according to httpRange-14 (please, I'm just trying to  
explain, not instigate another debate), the subject identifies the  
webpage which is about a book and not necessarily the book itself.   
Thus, I did not include the above triples because I wanted to conform  
with current standards on Linked Data.

Therefore, I withdraw previously stated wish made in fuzzy hindsight.   
Genies, be advised.

Jesse Weaver
Ph.D. Student, Patroon Fellow
Tetherless World Constellation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~weavej3/index.xhtml