- From: Joshua J Wulf <jwulf@redhat.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:24:40 +1000
- To: Kenley Lamaute <kenleyl@microsoft.com>
- CC: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <50121808.3050405@redhat.com>
On 07/27/2012 02:16 PM, Kenley Lamaute wrote: > > I've received direct feedback from several individuals on the Product > item proposal. After vetting several options, The most elegant > solution for reducing the complexity of requiring metadata updates to > already published pages, is to introduce two new fields to 'Product': > > • releaseDate - the product release date > > • productFamilyID - unique product family identifier > reused across product versions. For example: <meta > itemprop='productFamilyID' content='123-456-789'/>. > > This enables the scenario of a user searching for information about a > product (without specifying a version), and enabling the search engine > to favor results for the most recent product material. > > Example: > > *Legacy Product Content* > > Product = Windows Mobile 6.5 > > Model = 6.5 > > releaseDate=10/6/2009 > > productFamilyID=123-456-789 > > *Newer Product Content* > > Product = Windows Phone 7 > > Model =7 > > releaseDate=10/21/2010 > > productFamilyID=123-456-789 > > The example above shows how multiple products can be associated by a > ProductFamilyID, so that anyone seeking “mobile sdk for Windows” can > be offered content that applies to the latest technology first. > > If there are no objections, I'd like to revise the original proposal > for adding 'currentModel' to product, and replace it with this > solution of adding 'releaseDate' and 'productFamilyID' to the Product > item. > > -Kenley > Killer. Given that you can equate different Products by giving them the same productFamilyID, does the productFamilyID need to be a UUID? - Josh
Received on Friday, 27 July 2012 04:25:21 UTC