- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:44:27 +0200
- To: Leyla Jael García Castro <leyla.jael.garcia@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAK4ZFVFGkbvkMJpPzYbV0F2kA1apbn8p=61TT7t9psQUy2eB0A@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Leyla Did you have a look at http://www.w3.org/2011/content? You can also explore those results : http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/search/#s=content Best Bernard 2012/7/2 Leyla Jael García Castro <leyla.jael.garcia@gmail.com> > Hi all, > > I am modelling the structure and content of document. I am using DoCO ( > http://purl.org/spar/doco<http://www.essepuntato.it/lode/http://purl.org/spar/doco>) > for the structure, i.e. Section, Paragraph, etc. > Now I need to model the actual content in a paragraph, meaning the text in > it. Here an example: > > <myDocumentURI> pattern:contains [ a doco:Section > ; pattern:contains [ a doco:Paragraph > ; -content property- "This is the text in the paragraph." ] ] . > > What would be the best approach to do that? bibo:content ( > http://bibliontology.com/) is deprecated so I do not want to use that > one; the recommendation there is to use rdf:value, that would be an > alternative. sioc:content is another alternative. It could also > be c4o:hasContent (http://purl.org/spar/c4o). I guess there are also > other alternatives out there. > > Which one would be the best alternative? Any suggestions? > > Thanks so much, > > LJ > -- *Bernard Vatant * Vocabularies & Data Engineering Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 Skype : bernard.vatant Linked Open Vocabularies <http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov> -------------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca** ** * 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France www.mondeca.com Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 07:45:16 UTC