- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:06:24 +0200
- To: Hannes Mühleisen <muehleis@inf.fu-berlin.de>
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAK4ZFVF3fALdBNW4sxudwZH9LOYVH2KrHtF=GNP9RQKQY7qntQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Hannes Interesting stuff. Among top namespaces I see http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/ I must admit I did not know it ... and looking at http://data-vocabulary.org/ it seems that it has not been updated since 2010, and it seems to me widely redundant with, or prefiguration of schema.org. @schema.org folks : Since http://data-vocabulary.org/ seems to belong to Google, would not it be a great idea to have a note on this vocabulary along the lines of ... this vocabulary is obsolete, use schema.org instead? Or do I miss something? Bernard 2012/7/2 Hannes Mühleisen <muehleis@inf.fu-berlin.de> > Hello Vocabulary Enthusiasts, > > we have recently completed a study on vocabulary usage on Web pages using > the Microdata and RDFa encodings. We have analyzed both vocabulary as well > as class and property usage frequencies and property co-occurence for two > web crawls. These crawls contained 93 Million URLs with data using both > encodings from 2012, and 14 Million URLs from 2009/2010. The results are > available at > http://webdatacommons.org/vocabulary-usage-analysis/index.html . > > We hope our findings are useful in giving a small insight in what > vocabularies (or parts thereof) are used to annotate entities within HTML > pages. > > Regards, > > Hannes Mühleisen > > -- *Bernard Vatant * Vocabularies & Data Engineering Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 Skype : bernard.vatant Linked Open Vocabularies <http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov> -------------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca** ** * 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France www.mondeca.com Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
Received on Monday, 2 July 2012 09:07:23 UTC