- From: Breslin, John <john.breslin@nuigalway.ie>
- Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:43:31 +0100
- To: "Jean Delahousse" <delahousse.jean@gmail.com>
- Cc: <r@r-s.ro>, <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 12 August 2012 07:45:07 UTC
Reminds me of http://wineagent.tw.rpi.edu/ (Wine Ontology from Deborah McGuinness and wine agent) John http://bresl.in On 12 Aug 2012, at 08:41, "Jean Delahousse" <delahousse.jean@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > I would say it is two facets of a vision on the wine. > Depending on the type of editorial work I would use CreativeWork ( a web site about the best burgundy wines), product, or both at the same time > > Jean > > +33 6 01 22 48 55, KnowledgeConsult, delahousse.jean@gmail.com, http://jean-delahousse.net > > Le 11 août 2012 à 14:23, Radu Silaghi <r@r-s.ro> a écrit : > >> Hello everybody, >> >> What type do you think would better describe wines ? >> >> While schema.org/Product would be self-explanatory , schema.org/CreativeWork would better describe it with sourceOrganization, creator, award, rating, etc. >> >> Many thanks for feedback. >> >> Radu Silaghi >> >>
Received on Sunday, 12 August 2012 07:45:07 UTC