- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:13:01 -0500
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAChbWaPVYQU5y_nT1XDHnyEJKPuX4fCRkt0rwUY0AyiE-c9A8Q@mail.gmail.com>
I forgot to mention... with those existing schema.org Types, you should be able to recreate some Wine Reviews that I modeled here in Freebase<http://www.freebase.com/view/base/wineawards/views/wine_award> . On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > Wine is not a created work itself (although we like to think that way), > but instead a manufactured good or Product. Where you could have a > CreativeWork like an http://schema.org/Article about that manufactured > good or Product or even a thorough http://schema.org/Review that gave > the Wine Product a not so good http://schema.org/Rating > > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Radu Silaghi <r@r-s.ro> wrote: > >> Hello everybody, >> >> What type do you think would better describe wines ? >> >> While schema.org/Product would be self-explanatory , >> schema.org/CreativeWork would better describe it with >> sourceOrganization, creator, award, rating, etc. >> >> Many thanks for feedback. >> >> Radu Silaghi >> >> >> > > > -- > -Thad > http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry > -- -Thad http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry
Received on Saturday, 11 August 2012 14:13:30 UTC