- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:05:57 +0200
- To: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 1 August 2012 12:24, Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch> wrote: > Only one comment Dave, I actually raised the point on the rdf reflector about adding the time (and also date) datatype to the specification. This request was denied. They want to keep only dateTime. How can we reconcile both? Who denied what? Do you have an url to the discussion? Dan (grabbing mail but on vacation this week; I may not see replies for a few days) > JP > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@danbri.org] > Sent: jeudi, 26. juillet 2012 18:06 > To: public-vocabs@w3.org > Subject: schema.org v0.97 published, with 'DateTime' and 'Time' added to DataType > > Following along from last week's 0.96, we've rev'd the schema again > (to 0.97), adding in the two datatypes requested in > https://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/15 and needed for Good > Relations integration. > > Dan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway > **************************************************
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 16:06:25 UTC